#Vagrant docker for mac

In contrast, the table for Vagrant would look somewhat different. The table below illustrates the compatibility between host and guest OSes graphically:ĭocker Desktop compatibility between host and guest OS

#Vagrant docker for mac

On a macOS host, Docker Desktop for Mac uses hyperkit, a lightweight hypervisor, to run Linux-based Docker images in a hyperkit VM. To run Linux-based Docker images, Docker uses Windows’ WSL2 ( Windows Subsystem for Linux) by default, or alternatively the Hyper-V hypervisor. On a Windows host, Docker Desktop for Windows can run Windows-based Docker images (see here for a list) with Hyper-V. The performance is great, because no separate operating system (OS) needs to be started, and there are no inefficiencies caused by virtualization.

Natively means that applications run inside the container (guest) use the host’s kernel directly. On Linux hosts, Docker supports running Linux-based Docker containers natively, without virtualization. Let’s take a brief look at the technological basis for each tool, starting with Docker. I’ll assume that you are already familiar with Docker, at least on a basic level. Docker, help you decide which one to pick, and how they can be combined. In this article, which is part 3 of my Vagrant series, I compare Vagrant vs. Please read my other article, The complete introduction to Vagrant, for a complete introduction to Vagrant. Vagrant is an automation tool for creating and preparing virtual machines (VMs).

Scenario #2: Use Docker to provision software.

Scenario #1: Run Vagrant + Docker side by side.